BTC โ€” Longer Long + Weekly Selling (tenor sweep)

Same book as the Trade-This page (1-strike-OTM long wings + ATM weekly short call+put, base/base, IV-filter) but with a longer long: hold one long for 2/3/4 weeks and roll weekly shorts against it. The question: does a longer long help, or just lever the bet up?

What the data says โ€” it's leverage, not edge:

Takeaway: if you want more return, size up the 2wk/1wk (you control the DD) rather than buy a longer long (which buys you DD via vega). The longer long only wins if you're sure the vol regime stays benign โ€” which you can't be. Numbers: M2 bias-corrected 2024+ (DD-relevant long history), Tardis real 2026 (Mid = mark, Exec = against the orderbook, garbage quotes clamped).

Config matrix

long / short#shorts'24'25'2625+26M2 DDM2 r/DDTardis MidExec'26ExecDD
2wk / 1wk โ˜… base2+45+29+22+51-17.65.5+32.9+23.8-0.6
3wk / 1wk3+92+45+44+89-34.15.3+54.2+41.2-4.8
4wk / 1wk4+130+47+60+107-50.74.7+57.7+44.3-4.8
4wk / 2wk2+25+17+7+24-62.80.8+15.2+1.3-10.2

โ˜… base = the Trade-This variant (2wk/1wk). M2 DD = max drawdown 2024+ (the vega-aware view). Exec'26 = real Tardis against the book. Note how M2 DD blows up with the long tenor while real-2026 DD stays small โ€” that gap IS the un-hedged vega risk you take on with a longer long.

Equity โ€” M2 2024+ (the vega-aware view: longer long = bigger swings)

Equity โ€” real Tardis 2026, Execution against the book

Source: run_freq_data.py. Long = 1-strike-OTM call+put held to expiry; shorts = ATM call+put rolled weekly/2-weekly; base/base; IV-filter (DVOL < 90d median). R = % notional.