After mapping the whole surface (strikes, tenor, management, execution) on a regime-robust Monte-Carlo (800 bootstrapped paths) + real Tardis order-book data, the honest conclusion: no crypto weekly-premium structure is both high-return AND low-drawdown after real costs. You pick ONE:
Recommendation: if your stated priority (small drawdown) holds โ trade the hedged variant, small, with limit orders near mid, sized to your DD budget, as a low-correlation diversifier to the trend book. Start with ONE small position to measure your real fills before committing size.
| variant | ret med | p5 | DD med | worst | P(DD<โ10%) | win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hedged 3wk / 5-OTM / close โ | +13 | โ3 | โ4.7 | โ22 | 9% | 61% |
| Naked weekly 3-OTM | +30 | โ11 | โ16.0 | โ64 | 84% | 72% |
| Naked weekly 4-OTM | +29 | โ7 | โ13.9 | โ61 | 73% | 77% |
A naked-selling stop-loss looked like the holy grail (+48%/yr at โ7.7% DD) โ but that assumed a clean fill at the stop. Modelled realistically (intra-week trigger + slippage, because crypto gaps), it collapses:
| stop model (naked 3-OTM) | ret med | DD med | worst | P(DD<โ10%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stop @1.5ร clean (optimistic) | +48 | โ7.7 | โ30 | 29% |
| stop @1.5ร realistic (gap+5% slip) | +20 | โ16.5 | โ64 | 86% |
| stop @3ร realistic | +26 | โ16.8 | โ67 | 87% |
Why: crypto gaps through stops (you fill far past the trigger), and whipsaws stop you out then reverse. A long option wing, by contrast, pays its intrinsic no matter how big or fast the move โ it's a guaranteed cap, not a hopeful one. This is the whole reason the hedged variant is the real low-DD choice.
BTC grid $1000, ETH grid $25. (2wk long is essentially equivalent โ within MC noise.)
| asset | M2 25+26 | M2 DD | Tardis Exec 2026 | Tardis DD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | +23 | โ4.3 | +4.7 (full-touch) | โ1.3 |
| ETH | +28 | โ8.4 | +6.5 (full-touch) | โ1.7 |
| fill quality (BTC chosen variant) | ret med | DD med | ret/DD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid (patient limit @ mark) | +17 | โ3.9 | 4.3 |
| Half-touch (~2.5% RT โ realistic) | +15 | โ4.3 | 3.4 |
| Full-touch (~5% RT) | +13 | โ4.7 | 2.7 |
The gross edge is the variance-risk-premium (~5โ10%/yr in crypto); the bid-ask eats ~half. So limit orders near mid roughly add a full point of ret/DD. Discipline at entry > any further parameter tuning.
At 1ร the reference, the hedged variant's 95%-worst-year DD โ โ12% (median โ4.7%). Linear: for a โ6% worst-year budget run ~0.5ร; for โ12% run 1ร. Median return scales with it (~+13%/yr at 1ร). Because the structural DD is low, you can size up toward 1.5โ2%/mo and still keep the worst-year DD in the teens โ something the naked book can't do (its tail is โ60%+ at any size).