Weekly Option Selling โ€” Management Rules

How to manage SOLD weekly options (Friโ†’Fri, BTC/ETH). Tested on real Tardis marks (18 weeks 2026) AND a 3-year model history (124 weeks, by-year) โ€” every rule below survived both. Companion to the overnight report and the 5-sleeve portfolio.

1. THE WEDNESDAY PUT RULE โ˜… (the main finding)

Sold weekly PUT, exit day sweepTotalMaxDDr/DDnote
BTC real 2026: HOLD to expiry+5.7%โˆ’19.3%0.3tail hits late-week
BTC real: CLOSE WEDNESDAY+14.7%โˆ’5.4%2.7return ร—2.6, DD รท3.6
BTC model 24โ€“26: HOLD+74.0โˆ’40.21.8by-year +58/+15/+1
BTC model: WEDNESDAY+67.1โˆ’11.75.7+31/+21/+15 โ€” every year, smoother
ETH model: HOLD โ†’ WEDNESDAY+33.0 โ†’ +48.6โˆ’55.1 โ†’ โˆ’35.50.6 โ†’ 1.4return UP and DD down

Why it works: by Wednesday the sold put has earned ~77โ€“80% of its theta (median), while the remaining two days carry most of the tail (late-week / weekend crashes). Mon-exit is too early (theta not yet earned, negative), Tue is okay, Wednesday is the sweet spot, Thursday already degrades. Operationally trivial: buy back Wed 08:00 UTC.

2. Protection for Friโ†’Wed: spread vs threshold-stop vs daily check

BTC PUT + Wed exit (model 24โ€“26)TotalMaxDDr/DDverdict
naked + Wed+67.1โˆ’11.75.7the baseline is already good
+ long put โˆ’5% (spread)+11.3โˆ’7.41.5hedge eats 80% of the edge โ€” only if margin requires defined risk
+ futures-stop @ breakeven, HOURLY+72.6โˆ’10.27.1best across regimes (ETH: r/DD 1.4โ†’4.1, DD โˆ’56%)
+ stop checked once DAILY+50.6โˆ’17.62.9worse than NO stop โ€” late reaction, deeper entry, same whipsaw

Honest conflict: in the real 2026 window the hourly stop whipsawed (V-shaped dips before Wednesday; the real crashes came late-week โ€” which the Wed exit itself already avoids). Across 3 model years the stop pays. If you run a stop: continuous/hourly monitoring with auto-orders โ€” a manual daily check is strictly worse than nothing.

3. The CALL side is the mirror image โ€” different rules per asset

PUTCALL
Exitclose Wednesday (theta early, tail late)hold to expiry โ€” Wed exit destroys it (ETH real +31.4 hold vs โˆ’1.2 Wed; theta earned LATE)
Protectionhourly BE-stop optionalBTC: hourly BE-stop mandatory (naked โˆ’3.0/โˆ’48.4 over 3y; stopped +41.6/โˆ’18.8). Spread eats everything.
ETHโœ“ trade itโœ— don't sell ETH calls at all โ€” nothing makes them positive over 3 years (naked โˆ’4.6/โˆ’67.7, stopped โˆ’11.4, spread ~0)

3b. Bear-call SPREADS (sell X% OTM / buy Y% OTM, hold to expiry)

VariantBTC M2 24-26 (by-year)ETH M2 24-26 (by-year)real 2026 exec (BTC / ETH)
ATM/+5%โˆ’12.8 / DD โˆ’27.6 (โˆ’24/+10/+1)+0.3 / โˆ’17.6+1.0 / +2.9
2%/+5%โˆ’3.7 / โˆ’23.3+8.0 / โˆ’11.8+3.1 / +3.7
2%/+7%โˆ’4.1 / โˆ’28.9+13.4 / โˆ’17.7 r0.8 (โˆ’11/+16/+8)+5.3 / +9.1
3%/+8%โˆ’8.4 / โˆ’29.0+13.9 / โˆ’17.3 r0.8 (โˆ’13/+17/+10)+6.7 / +8.1

Verdict: (a) BTC: spreads LOSE across 3 years (2024 bull kills every variant, โˆ’20 to โˆ’24) โ€” the validated BTC call route stays naked + hourly BE-stop (+41.6/โˆ’18.8/r2.2, positive every year), clearly superior to any spread. (b) ETH: wide spreads (2%/+7%, 3%/+8%) are the FIRST ETH-call structure with a positive 3-year total (+13.4/+13.9) โ€” naked (โˆ’4.6) and stopped (โˆ’11.4) both lose. BUT r/DD is only 0.8 and 2024 is still negative (โˆ’11/โˆ’13): it upgrades ETH calls from "never" to "weakest corner, only if you insist" โ€” the book rule (don't sell ETH calls) stands. Real-2026 numbers (+8โ€“9% exec) are bear-flattered.

3c. Optimization matrix 2025+2026 (5 strikes ร— 3 widths, 2024 shown as robustness reference): the consistent pattern across the whole matrix โ€” not one lucky cell โ€” is further OTM short (2โ€“3%) + TIGHT width (+3%): the tight cover hard-caps bull damage while the OTM short still collects. Best cells: ETH 3%/+3% โ†’ 25+26: +19.2 / DD โˆ’6.7 / r2.88 / win 79 / worst โˆ’2.5, and 2024 only โˆ’7 โ€” the first call-spread that nearly survives the bull year (3y total โ‰ˆ +12). BTC 2%/+3% โ†’ 25+26: +16.8 / DD โˆ’6.7 / r2.49 โ€” but 2024 โˆ’20: for BTC the naked+hourly-stop route stays superior across regimes; the tight spread is the defined-risk alternative when margin matters. โš ๏ธ These cells were SELECTED on 25+26 (15 candidates) โ€” expect out-of-sample below these numbers; the structural tilt (tight + further OTM) is the durable part, not the exact cell.

3d. ADAPTIVE IRON CONDOR โ˜… โ€” add a put-credit-spread when the market rallies (Sven's idea)

Mode (call-spread base from 3c)25+26 TotalDDr/DDworst wk2024real 2026 exec
BTC call-spread SOLO+16.8โˆ’6.72.5โˆ’2.8โˆ’20+3.1 / r0.7
BTC + put-spread after +2% rally โ˜…+27.4โˆ’4.36.4โˆ’2.2โˆ’11+9.9 / r3.9
ETH call-spread SOLO+19.2โˆ’6.72.9โˆ’2.5โˆ’7+4.6 / r1.4
ETH + put-spread after +2% rally โ˜…+23.8โˆ’4.35.5โˆ’2.2โˆ’7+7.6 / r5.7
trigger at short-strike TOUCH insteadworse everywhere (ETH even below solo) โ€” too late/too rare
STATIC iron condor (both sides upfront)good in the 2026 bear, weaker across regimes (win 46โ€“50%)

Rule: open the bear-call-spread Friday; if spot rallies +2% intra-week, sell a put-credit-spread (2% OTM from the NEW spot / 3 points wide, same expiry), hold both to expiry. Improves EVERY column vs solo โ€” return, DD, worst week, even 2024 (BTC โˆ’20 โ†’ โˆ’11) โ€” so it is not period-picking. The feared double-loss (rally โ†’ add puts โ†’ reversal) does NOT materialize: after a +2% rally the new put strike sits ~at the old entry level, so a reversal first rescues the call side before it threatens the puts; defined risk caps both ends. Mechanically the same medicine as the sequential diagonal (momentum gate on the put side) โ€” second independent confirmation of that pattern. Operationally: one price alert at +2%, no monitoring. Caveats: +2% is one tested trigger (touch variant is worse โ†’ some parameter sensitivity); real n=18.

4. Sequential diagonal (phase-in the put side)

For the 2wk/1wk double diagonal: selling the CALL side first and adding the PUT side only after spot rises +2% (a momentum gate on the dangerous side) cuts model MaxDD โˆ’22% (โˆ’21.6 โ†’ โˆ’16.8) at r/DD 4.5 โ†’ 5.0, costing โˆ’13% return (puts deployed in 76% of campaigns). The first sequencing trigger that ever helped. CALL_ONLY is NOT the answer (+42.5/โˆ’21.8 โ€” the DD does not come from the put side). Model-only so far; real-marks check pending.

5. Combined rule set (what survives both worlds)

Sold weekly PUTS (BTC + ETH): close Wednesday 08:00. Optional hourly BE-stop (regime-robust, whipsaw cost in V-markets).
Sold weekly CALLS: BTC only, hold to expiry, hourly BE-stop mandatory. Never sell ETH calls.
Spreads: not as a standing hedge (eat 80%+ of edge on both sides) โ€” only when margin/defined-risk is required.
Daily-frequency stop checks: rejected โ€” worse than no stop. Threshold logic needs continuous monitoring.
โš ๏ธ Caveats: real window = 18 weeks of one high-IV bear; model = M2 (patterns transfer, levels optimistic ~2ร—). All exits priced at marks (mid) โ€” add spread cost for market-order execution. Sequential diagonal not yet real-validated.
Sources: run_sven_weekly_exit.py ยท run_sven_wed_hedge.py ยท run_sven_seq_diag.py ยท run_sven_theta_decay.py ยท log: NIK_ALGOS_LOG.md.